Marriage as an Economic Institution
As a romantic comedy, the play
focuses principally on the romantic relationships between men and women as they
develop from initial interest into marriage. In this respect, the play is a
typical romantic comedy. However, unlike other Shakespearean comedies, The
Taming of the Shrew does not conclude its examination of love and marriage
with the wedding. Rather, it offers a significant glimpse into the future lives
of married couples, one that serves to round out its exploration of the social
dimension of love.
Unlike in Romeo and Juliet,
inner emotional desire plays only a secondary role in The Taming of the
Shrew’s exploration of love. Instead, The Taming of the Shrew
emphasizes the economic aspects of marriage—specifically, how economic
considerations determine who marries whom. The play tends to explore romantic
relationships from a social perspective, addressing the institutions of
courtship and marriage rather than the inner passions of lovers. Moreover, the
play focuses on how courtship affects not just the lovers themselves, but also
their parents, their servants, and their friends. In general, while the husband
and the wife conduct the marriage relationship after the wedding, the courtship
relationship is negotiated between the future husband and the father of the
future wife. As such, marriage becomes a transaction involving the transfer of
money. Lucentio wins Bianca’s heart, but he is given permission to marry her
only after he is able to convince Baptista that he is fabulously rich. Had
Hortensio offered more money, he would have married Bianca, regardless of
whether she loved Lucentio.
The Effect of Social Roles on Individual Happiness
Each person in the play occupies a
specific social position that carries with it certain expectations about how
that person should behave. A character’s social position is defined by such
things as his or her wealth, age, gender, profession, parentage, and education;
the rules governing how each of them should behave are harshly enforced by
family, friends, and society as a whole. For instance, Lucentio occupies the
social role of a wealthy young student, Tranio that of a servant, and Bianca
and Katherine the roles of upper-class young maidens-in-waiting. At the very
least, they are supposed to occupy these roles—but, as the play shows, in
reality, Kate wants nothing to do with her social role, and her shrewishness
results directly from her frustration concerning her position. Because she does
not live up to the behavioral expectations of her society, she faces the cold disapproval
of that society, and, due to her alienation, she becomes miserably unhappy.
Kate is only one of the many characters in The Taming of the Shrew who
attempt to circumvent or deny their socially defined roles, however: Lucentio
transforms himself into a working-class Latin tutor, Tranio transforms himself
into a wealthy young aristocrat, Christopher Sly is transformed from a tinker
into a lord, and so forth.
Compared with Katherine’s more
serious anguish about her role, the other characters’ attempts to circumvent
social expectations seem like harmless fun. However, the play illustrates that
each transformation must be undone before conventional life can resume at the
end of the play. Ultimately, society’s happiness depends upon everyone playing
his or her prescribed roles. Through the motif of disguise, the play entertains
the idea that a person’s apparel determines his or her social position, but it
ultimately affirms that this is not the case. A servant may put on the clothes
of a lord, but he remains a servant, one who must return to his place, as we
see with Tranio. Likewise, Lucentio must reveal his subterfuge to his father
and to Baptista before moving forward with Bianca. Kate’s development over the
course of the play is basically determined by her gradual adaptation to her new
social role as wife. She complies with Petruchio’s humiliating regimen of
taming because she knows on some level that, whether she likes the role of wife
or not, she will be happier accepting her social obligations than living as she
has been at odds with everyone connected to her. In fact, the primary
excitement in The Taming of the Shrew stems from its permeable social
boundaries, crisscrossed continually by those who employ a disguise or a clever
lie. In the end, however, the conventional order reestablishes itself, and
those characters who harmonize with that order achieve personal happiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment