Different Types of Romantic Love
Modern readers associate the sonnet
form with romantic love and with good reason: the first sonnets written in
thirteenth- and fourteenth-century Italy celebrated the poets’ feelings for
their beloveds and their patrons. These sonnets were addressed to stylized,
lionized women and dedicated to wealthy noblemen, who supported poets with
money and other gifts, usually in return for lofty praise in print. Shakespeare
dedicated his sonnets to “Mr. W. H.,” and the identity of this man remains
unknown. He dedicated an earlier set of poems, Venus and Adonis and Rape
of Lucrece, to Henry Wriothesly, earl of Southampton, but it’s not known
what Wriothesly gave him for this honor. In contrast to tradition, Shakespeare
addressed most of his sonnets to an unnamed young man, possibly Wriothesly.
Addressing sonnets to a young man was unique in Elizabethan England.
Furthermore, Shakespeare used his sonnets to explore different types of love
between the young man and the speaker, the young man and the dark lady, and the
dark lady and the speaker. In his sequence, the speaker expresses passionate
concern for the young man, praises his beauty, and articulates what we would
now call homosexual desire. The woman of Shakespeare’s sonnets, the so-called
dark lady, is earthy, sexual, and faithless—characteristics in direct
opposition to lovers described in other sonnet sequences, including Astrophil
and Stella, by Sir Philip Sidney, a contemporary of Shakespeare, who were
praised for their angelic demeanor, virginity, and steadfastness. Several
sonnets also probe the nature of love, comparing the idealized love found in
poems with the messy, complicated love found in real life.
The Dangers of Lust and Love
In Shakespeare’s sonnets, falling in
love can have painful emotional and physical consequences. Sonnets 127–152,
addressed to the so-called dark lady, express a more overtly erotic and
physical love than the sonnets addressed to the young man. But many sonnets
warn readers about the dangers of lust and love. According to some poems, lust
causes us to mistake sexual desire for true love, and love itself causes us to
lose our powers of perception. Several sonnets warn about the dangers of lust,
claiming that it turns humans “savage, extreme, rude, cruel” (4), as in Sonnet
129. The final two sonnets of Shakespeare’s sequence obliquely imply that lust
leads to venereal disease. According to the conventions of romance, the sexual
act, or “making love,” expresses the deep feeling between two people. In his
sonnets, however, Shakespeare portrays making love not as a romantic expression
of sentiment but as a base physical need with the potential for horrible
consequences.
Several sonnets equate being in love
with being in a pitiful state: as demonstrated by the poems, love causes fear,
alienation, despair, and physical discomfort, not the pleasant emotions or
euphoria we usually associate with romantic feelings. The speaker alternates
between professing great love and professing great worry as he speculates about
the young man’s misbehavior and the dark lady’s multiple sexual partners. As
the young man and the dark lady begin an affair, the speaker imagines himself
caught in a love triangle, mourning the loss of his friendship with the man and
love with the woman, and he laments having fallen in love with the woman in the
first place. In Sonnet 137, the speaker personifies love, calls him a
simpleton, and criticizes him for removing his powers of perception. It was
love that caused the speaker to make mistakes and poor judgments. Elsewhere the
speaker calls love a disease as a way of demonstrating the physical pain of
emotional wounds. Throughout his sonnets, Shakespeare clearly implies that love
hurts. Yet despite the emotional and physical pain, like the speaker, we
continue falling in love. Shakespeare shows that falling in love is an
inescapable aspect of the human condition—indeed, expressing love is part of
what makes us human.
Real Beauty vs. Clichéd Beauty
To express the depth of their
feelings, poets frequently employ hyperbolic terms to describe the objects of
their affections. Traditionally, sonnets transform women into the most glorious
creatures to walk the earth, whereas patrons become the noblest and bravest men
the world has ever known. Shakespeare makes fun of the convention by contrasting
an idealized woman with a real woman. In Sonnet 130, Shakespeare directly
engages—and skewers—clichéd concepts of beauty. The speaker explains that his
lover, the dark lady, has wires for hair, bad breath, dull cleavage, a heavy
step, and pale lips. He concludes by saying that he loves her all the more
precisely because he loves her and not some idealized, false version.
Real love, the sonnet implies, begins when we accept our lovers for what they
are as well as what they are not. Other sonnets explain that because anyone can
use artful means to make himself or herself more attractive, no one is really
beautiful anymore. Thus, since anyone can become beautiful, calling someone
beautiful is no longer much of a compliment.
The Responsibilities of Being Beautiful
Shakespeare portrays beauty as
conveying a great responsibility in the sonnets addressed to the young man,
Sonnets 1–126. Here the speaker urges the young man to make his beauty immortal
by having children, a theme that appears repeatedly throughout the poems: as an
attractive person, the young man has a responsibility to procreate. Later
sonnets demonstrate the speaker, angry at being cuckolded, lashing out at the
young man and accusing him of using his beauty to hide immoral acts. Sonnet 95
compares the young man’s behavior to a “canker in the fragrant rose” (2) or a
rotten spot on an otherwise beautiful flower. In other words, the young man’s
beauty allows him to get away with bad behavior, but this bad behavior will
eventually distort his beauty, much like a rotten spot eventually spreads.
Nature gave the young man a beautiful face, but it is the young man’s
responsibility to make sure that his soul is worthy of such a visage.
No comments:
Post a Comment