Creating effective questionnaires and surveys and analysing the data
Research
Should be
systematic.
Primary research – Creates new knowledge, collects new data
and establishes new facts. 1) Quantitative: Collects data and uses it to draw
conclusions eg. Survey of library user’s use of the internet. 2) Qualitative:
Concerned with views, attitudes, behaviour eg. How useful do they find the
library’s internet guidance notes?
Secondary research – Finding and using existing
information. May use books, journals,
the Internet.
The research brief must articulate a clear purpose to the
research and set out clear aims and objectives (what will be researched, how
etc.) Consider factors affecting the
research: Budget, time, availability of people to respond to surveys etc. Consider purpose of the research: To evaluate
a service, to formulate policy etc.
Research aims and objectives
Clarification of aims
and objectives helps to gain a focus on specific information required from the
research, ideas about research strategy and methodology and, later on, allows
an assessment of whether or not sufficient information has been gathered from
the research.
Having established aims and objectives, consider boundary
issues which will affect how the research is conducted. Examples: geographical remit, budget,
timeframe, level of detail, authorisation, presentation of findings.
Research methodologies:
- Observation and experiments Observe what is happening, for
example - people’s behaviour, regular
problems encountered with a particular service etc. This can develop into an experiment when, for
example, a solution to a perceived problem is implemented – how do people
respond to the solution?
These methods can provide information about what is
happening but do not necessarily give reasons why.
- Survey methods
Questionnaires
Versatile – paper or electronic, can be given to
participants to complete independently or can form the basis of structured
interviews.
Ensure that questions are worded and structured
appropriately:
Open questions – Require an answer that hasn’t been
pre-determined by the researcher but require more thought so may put some
respondents off.
Closed questions – More easily analysed but care must be
taken to ensure that all possible response options are covered.
Question formats 1) Lists – Respondents can select all
applicable answers (eg. Which of the following library services have you used
in the past 6 months?) 2) Category boxes – Respondents can only select 1 answer
(eg. How old are you?) 3) Grids – Ask more than 1 question at a time (eg. How
often do you use the following services?) 4) Ranking – Place things in order of
importance (eg. Which is the most important library service? Lending,
reference, Internet access etc.)
Common flaws in questionnaire design Leading questions
Assuming an opinion in the questions Vague questions Questions asking more than
one thing in a format that doesn’t allow an appropriate answer Pointless
questions Unclear instructions Insensitive / offensive questions
Always pilot a questionnaire before release to highlight
potential problems.
Other considerations If conducting a face-to-face survey,
consider time of day Response rates –
likely to be lower if the questionnaire is long or contains lots of open
questions Whether the sample will be randomly selected (ie. whoever walks past
at the time) or quota sampled (ie. based on gender, ethnicity etc)
Interviews and focus groups
Interviews provide a question framework but bring the
benefit of allowing the researcher to ask follow up questions. For the purposes of analysis, responses can
be grouped into corresponding themes, opinions etc. Results can also be presented as case studies
to illustrate trends. Due to time
constraints, sample groups will tend to be smaller than with
questionnaires.
Focus groups also provide further qualitative data. They can be very useful as a starting point
as they are likely to increase the researcher’s knowledge of the subject under
investigation and introduce possible lines of enquiry to be followed up.
It can be helpful to tape interviews and focus groups.
Recording research findings The simplest method is to use a spreadsheet
or database. Responses can be coded to
allow entry into the spreadsheet / database.
Of the MS applications Excel works best on numerical data,
giving far more scope for complex calculations, and Access
with alpha or alphanumeric data, since it can cope with reasonable amounts of
text.
Analysing research findings Simplest
form:
Top line data – How many respondents answered a certain
question in a certain way.
More detailed: Bivariate and multi-variate analysis – Gives
more details about particular sub- groups and sub-categories. Responses are analysed by reference to
particular groups (ie. by age).
Multi-variate analysis looks at a wide range of variables, helping to
bring out trends and relationships. When
analysing results, care must be taken that trends and relationships are not
coincidental.
Explain data within the framework of the research aims and
objectives.
Main statistical methods for analysis: Frequency (50 men, 50 women): Number of
responses from raw data Proportions (0.5
men, 0.5 women): Frequency figure divided by frequency total Percentages (50 % men, 50% women):
Proportion multiplied by 100, useful for measuring rates of change Ratios (men
to women 1:1): Divide 1st figure by itself (=1) and 2nd figure by the 1st (in
this case also = 1)
Calculating the average Note the different ways of
expressing an ‘average’ 1) Mode – Most frequently occurring answer, highlights
the largest ‘modal’ group 2) Median – Middle value from the data range, the
point halfway between the two central values 3) Mean – Total sum of the answers
divided by the number of answers (easily distorted by an occasional high
value)
Data can be analysed using both Excel and Access. Excel creates charts and calculates the mode,
median and mean. Access isolates
particular queries from the set of data.
No comments:
Post a Comment